Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 9 de 9
Filter
1.
Clin Infect Dis ; 73(2): e426-e433, 2021 07 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1315657

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pneumonia is a newly recognized disease, and its diagnosis is primarily confirmed by routine reverse transcriptase -polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) detection of SARS-CoV-2. METHODS: However, we report a confirmed case of SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia with a negative routine RT-PCR. RESULTS: This case was finally diagnosed by nanopore sequencing combined with antibody of SARS-CoV-2. Simultaneously, the ORF and NP gene variations of SARS-CoV-2 were found. CONCLUSIONS: This case highlighted that false-negative results could be present in routine RT-PCR diagnosis, especially with virus variation. Currently, nanopore pathogen sequencing and antibody detection have been found to be effective in clinical diagnosis.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , China , Humans , RNA-Directed DNA Polymerase , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction
2.
Ann Transl Med ; 9(8): 621, 2021 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1224385

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Since there are reports of cases of 2019-coronavirus disease (COVID-19) asymptomatic carriers in China recently and fever is one of the main symptoms, we aimed to distinguish COVID-19 cases from other febrile patients with clinical examinations in this study. METHODS: A total of 134 suspected COVID-19 patients in the isolation ward of the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University were recruited from January 23 to May 23, 2020. We analyze the pathogenic form and clinical characteristics. RESULTS: Among them, pathogens were identified in only 84 patients (62.7%), including 23 (17.1%) with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), 30 (22.3%) with other viruses, 31 (25.0%) with other pathogens and 3 (3.5%) with mixed infections. The commonly observed symptoms of COVID-19 patients were cough, fever, fatigue, and muscle aches, which were significantly different than the symptoms of nonviral infections (P<0.05) but from those of other viral infections (P>0.05). Furthermore, lactate dehydrogenase and the neutrophil/lymphocyte were found significantly high in COVID-19 patients compared to non-COVID-19 patients (P<0.05). The most common manifestations of COVID-19 patients were ground-glass opacities (100%) with or without lung consolidation, however, they also often showed involvement of several lobes of both lungs (P<0.05). Due to the clear differential diagnosis, the overall antibiotic use rate was 35.8% (31/87). CONCLUSIONS: When diagnosing COVID-19, infections with other pathogens should not be ignored. Successful pathogen identification will support accurate treatment.

3.
Sci China Life Sci ; 64(12): 2129-2143, 2021 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1212915

ABSTRACT

Prolonged viral RNA shedding and recurrence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients have been reported. However, the clinical outcome and pathogenesis remain unclear. In this study, we recruited 43 laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 patients. We found that prolonged viral RNA shedding or recurrence mainly occurred in severe/critical patients (P<0.05). The average viral shedding time in severe/critical patients was more than 50 days, and up to 100 days in some patients, after symptom onset. However, chest computed tomography gradually improved and complete absorption occurred when SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR was still positive, but specific antibodies appeared. Furthermore, the viral shedding time significantly decreased when the A1,430G or C12,473T mutation occurred (P<0.01 and FDR<0.01) and increased when G227A occurred (P<0.05 and FDR<0.05). High IL1R1, IL1R2, and TNFRSF21 expression in the host positively correlated with viral shedding time (P<0.05 and false discovery rate <0.05). Prolonged viral RNA shedding often occurs but may not increase disease damage. Prolonged viral RNA shedding is associated with viral mutations and host factors.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/virology , SARS-CoV-2/pathogenicity , Adult , Antibodies, Neutralizing/blood , Antibodies, Viral/blood , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/pathology , China/epidemiology , Female , Gene Expression Profiling , Genome, Viral/genetics , Hospitalization , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Lung/pathology , Male , Middle Aged , Mutation , RNA, Viral/genetics , RNA, Viral/metabolism , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , SARS-CoV-2/physiology , Time Factors , Virus Replication , Virus Shedding
4.
Med Sci Monit ; 27: e929708, 2021 Apr 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1148368

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND Since the outbreak of COVID-19 in December 2019, there have been 96 623 laboratory-confirmed cases and 4784 deaths by December 29 in China. We aimed to analyze the risk factors and the incidence of thrombosis from patients with confirmed COVID-19 pneumonia. MATERIAL AND METHODS Eighty-eight inpatients with confirmed COVID-19 pneumonia were reported (31 critical cases, 33 severe cases, and 24 common cases). The thrombosis risk factor assessment, laboratory results, ultrasonographic findings, and prognoses of these patients were analyzed, and compared among groups with different severity. RESULTS Nineteen of the 88 cases developed DVT (12 critical cases, 7 severe cases, and no common cases). In addition, among the 18 patients who died, 5 were diagnosed with DVT. Positive correlations were observed between the increase in D-dimer level (≥5 µg/mL) and the severity of COVID-19 pneumonia (r=0.679, P<0.01), and between the high Padua score (≥4) and the severity (r=0.799, P<0.01). In addition, the CRP and LDH levels on admission had positive correlations with the severity of illness (CRP: r=0.522, P<0.01; LDH: r=0.600, P<0.01). A negative correlation was observed between the lymphocyte count on admission and the severity of illness (r=-0.523, P<0.01). There was also a negative correlation between the lymphocyte count on admission and mortality in critical patients (r=-0.499, P<0.01). Univariable logistic regression analysis showed that the occurrence of DVT was positively correlated with disease severity (crude odds ratio: 3.643, 95% CI: 1.218-10.896, P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS Our report illustrates that critically or severely ill patients have an associated high D-dimer value and high Padua score, and illustrates that a low threshold to screen for DVT may help improve detection of thromboembolism in these groups of patients, especially in asymptomatic patients. Our results suggest that early administration of prophylactic anticoagulant would benefit the prognosis of critical patients with COVID-19 pneumonia and would likely reduce thromboembolic rates.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/complications , Fibrin Fibrinogen Degradation Products/analysis , Venous Thrombosis/epidemiology , Adult , Aged , Asymptomatic Diseases , COVID-19/blood , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19 Testing , China/epidemiology , Female , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Incidence , Lower Extremity/blood supply , Lower Extremity/diagnostic imaging , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Admission , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment/methods , Risk Assessment/statistics & numerical data , Risk Factors , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , Severity of Illness Index , Ultrasonography , Venous Thrombosis/blood , Venous Thrombosis/diagnosis , Venous Thrombosis/etiology
5.
Jpn J Infect Dis ; 73(6): 404-410, 2020 Nov 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-976564

ABSTRACT

This study aims to investigate blood and biochemical laboratory findings in patients with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and to develop a joint predictor for predicting the likelihood of severe COVID-19 and its adverse clinical outcomes and to provide more information for treatment. We collected the data of 88 patients with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19. Further, the patients were divided into a non-severe group and a critical group (including critically ill cases). Univariate analysis showed that the absolute lymphocyte count, albumin level, albumin/globulin ratio, lactate dehydrogenase level, interleukin-6 (IL-6) level, erythrocyte count, globulin level, blood glucose level, and age were significantly correlated with the severity of COVID-19. The multivariate binary logistic regression model revealed that age, absolute lymphocyte count, and IL-6 level were independent risk factors in patients with COVID-19. The receiver operating characteristic curve revealed that the combination of IL-6 level, absolute lymphocyte count, and age is superior to a single factor as predictors for severe COVID-19, regardless of whether it is in terms of the area under the curve or the prediction sensitivity and specificity. Early application is beneficial to early identification of critically ill patients and timing individual treatments to reduce mortality.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Testing , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/pathology , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19 Testing/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Interleukin-6/blood , Logistic Models , Lymphocyte Count , Male , Middle Aged , ROC Curve , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , SARS-CoV-2 , Severity of Illness Index , Young Adult
6.
J Clin Lab Anal ; 35(1): e23598, 2021 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-808714

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to investigate blood and biochemical laboratory findings in patients with coronavirus disease (COVID-19) and analyze the potential predictors of poor outcome in patients with COVID-19. METHODS: The clinical, laboratory, and outcome data of 87 patients with COVID-19 were collected and retrospectively analyzed. Only data collected at the time of admission were used in the analysis for predictors of poor outcome. These patients were divided into two groups: the adverse prognosis group (36 patients) and the non-adverse prognosis group (51 patients). The adverse prognosis of COVID-19 patients was defined as admission to the intensive care unit or death. RESULTS: On the univariate analysis, age, white blood cell (WBC) count, neutrophil counts, lymphocytes count, neutrophils-to-lymphocytes ratio (NLR), interleukin-6, albumin-to-globulin ratio (AGR), albumin, lactate dehydrogenase, glutamyl transpeptidase, and blood glucose were found to be the significant predictors. On the multivariate analysis, the predictors of poor outcome of patients with COVID-19 were NLR (OR = 2.741, [95% CI = 1.02 ~ 7.35], P = .045) and IL-6 (OR = 1.405, [95% CI = 1.04 ~ 1.89, P = .025]). The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve revealed that the AUC of NLR, interleukin-6, pneumonia severity index (PSI) score, and Confusion-Urea-Respiratory Rate-Blood pressure-65 (CURB-65) score were 0.883, 0.852, 0.824, and 0.782, respectively. CONCLUSION: High interleukin-6 (6 pg/mL, cuff value) and NLR (4.48, cuff value) can be used to predict poor outcomes in patients with COVID-19 on admission, thus can serve as a beneficial tool for timely identifying COVID-19 patients prone to poor outcome and reduce patient mortality through early intervention.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/blood , COVID-19/mortality , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Blood Chemical Analysis , COVID-19/etiology , COVID-19/therapy , Female , Humans , Intensive Care Units , Interleukin-6/blood , Leukocyte Count , Lymphocyte Count , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Neutrophils , Prognosis , ROC Curve , Retrospective Studies , Young Adult
8.
Clin Infect Dis ; 71(8): 1980-1981, 2020 11 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-47274

ABSTRACT

The 2019 novel coronavirus was detected in self-collected throat washings. The positive testing rate of throat washing was much higher than that of nasopharyngeal swabs. Throat washing is a promising candidate for 2019-nCoV screening and monitoring due to its noninvasiveness and reliability.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections , Coronavirus , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections/diagnosis , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Humans , Mouth , Pharynx , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Reproducibility of Results , SARS-CoV-2
9.
J Med Virol ; 92(9): 1518-1524, 2020 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2600

ABSTRACT

The outbreak of the novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) quickly spread all over China and to more than 20 other countries. Although the virus (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus [SARS-Cov-2]) nucleic acid real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test has become the standard method for diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection, these real-time PCR test kits have many limitations. In addition, high false-negative rates were reported. There is an urgent need for an accurate and rapid test method to quickly identify a large number of infected patients and asymptomatic carriers to prevent virus transmission and assure timely treatment of patients. We have developed a rapid and simple point-of-care lateral flow immunoassay that can detect immunoglobulin M (IgM) and IgG antibodies simultaneously against SARS-CoV-2 virus in human blood within 15 minutes which can detect patients at different infection stages. With this test kit, we carried out clinical studies to validate its clinical efficacy uses. The clinical detection sensitivity and specificity of this test were measured using blood samples collected from 397 PCR confirmed COVID-19 patients and 128 negative patients at eight different clinical sites. The overall testing sensitivity was 88.66% and specificity was 90.63%. In addition, we evaluated clinical diagnosis results obtained from different types of venous and fingerstick blood samples. The results indicated great detection consistency among samples from fingerstick blood, serum and plasma of venous blood. The IgM-IgG combined assay has better utility and sensitivity compared with a single IgM or IgG test. It can be used for the rapid screening of SARS-CoV-2 carriers, symptomatic or asymptomatic, in hospitals, clinics, and test laboratories.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Viral/immunology , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/immunology , Immunoassay , Immunoglobulin G/immunology , Immunoglobulin M/immunology , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , Antibodies, Viral/blood , COVID-19/virology , Humans , Immunoassay/methods , Immunoglobulin G/blood , Immunoglobulin M/blood , Point-of-Care Testing , Reagent Kits, Diagnostic , Reagent Strips , Sensitivity and Specificity
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL